The new series of BBC’s “Strictly Come Dancing” is expected to hit our screens in September and there already seems to be quite a bit of controversy surrounding the show.
After last years voting debacle (in which irrespective of how many public votes he won, Tom Chambers could not be saved from the dance-off; high drama indeed) one might have thought it would take a few episodes before people were given a reason to start complaining.
This time around however, the furore is surrounding the judges, not the contestants. It seems that Arlene Phillips has (allegedly) been given the elbow for being too old (she’s 66) and will instead be replaced by Alesha Dixon (30), the 2007 winner. The BBC denies accusations of ageism, though accepts that they are trying to pull in a younger audience than their average 52 year old. Slightly mixed messages? I’m not really sure, but what is clear is that out of the 5-strong regulars (Brucie – 81, Len Goodman – 65, Bruno Tonioli – 53, Craig Revel Horwood 44) it was the lady of the show who was shown the door.
Given previous allegations of the BBC treating the more mature lady rather unfairly (namely Moira Stuart being axed from her Sunday morning news bulletin) you can understand the consternation surrounding the decision. I for one am not really sure whether it is about ageism, or a pre-show publicity drive or just that Arlene didn’t really add anything extra to the judging panel. What I am certain of though, is that throughout all of these discussions Ms Dixon is being lauded as a “youthful” creature, giving hope to fellow 30 year olds everywhere!